The review describes other author's comments about the reviewed entity.
The information should be structured - positive, neutral, negative.
The summary of the review.
Fill in the short and self-explanatory summary of the review.
Unspecified comment - other relevant information.
Enter neutral comments about the reviewed subject.
Argumentation to support the described entity.
Enter the argumentation which supports the utilization of the reviewed entity.
Describe the controversies about the reviewed subject?
Enter the controversial information which impedes the utilization of the reviewed entity.
Fill in if there are any additional limits limiting the use of the reviewed entity.
For example if these data can not be utilized in some limit cases not described in the documentation, mention it here.
The name of the review as it is displayed in the lists (may be abbreviated).
When the computer is manipulating with the name of the review (creating lists, references etc.) it uses this piece of metadata.
If it is possible, define your trust in the reviewed entity (0 or 1).
You do not have to enter the trust - it helps only if it is unambiguous (never trust = 0 or allways trust = 1)
The author (or authors) of the review.
You may enter multiple authors.
Citation of published work
The reviewed entity
The reviewed entity refernce - must be defined (what are you reviewing?).